CHUCKING KILLS CRICKET

CHUCKING $ MATCH FIXING  ARE  THE TWO  INCURABLE MALADIES AFFECTED TO MODERN DAY CRICKET
 Marlon Samuels is reported for chucking in the IPL SEASON 5...ITS QUITE INJUSTICE...what about others?...MALINGA  chucked OWAIS SHAH  2 daysback,an excellent innings came to an end through an UNDERARM ILLEGAL DELIVERY.Everybody praised Malinga for the ball ,none is ready to comment against him

.What is Murlitharan doing ?...he is just chucking ,Harbhajan also chucks atleast once in each and every over... .Johan Botha ..and the list continues ..... DEAR UMPIRES ..I CHALLENGE YOU ..ARE YOU BOLD ENOUGH TO CATCH   MALINGA,MURALITHARAN ,HARBHAJAN ,BOTHA AND ALL THE OTHER BIG CHUCKERS? NO, YOU CANT ...
Marlon Samuels is an occasional chucker  so he must be caught but THE  BIG CATS are also be punished.By punishing only Samuels BCCI proved yet agauin that they are   A SPINELESS BUNCH
   PLEASE READ   THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE WHICH I POSTED ON MARCH 20 th AND  DO WHAT YOU CAN  TO SAVE THIS WONDERFUL GAME  FROM  CHUCKING AND  ILLEGAL BETTING

************************************************************************
....Indian cricketers have raised their concern over P akistan  cricketor  AJMAL'S bowling  action after  the high-voltage match against India in the 2012 Asia cup but the Indian team management has decided not to go ahead with its strong reservations over Saeed Ajmal’s action after the International Cricket Council (ICC) made it clear that the off-spinner’s action was legal....(because we also have chuckkers)

The 34-year-old Ajmal has been in the midst of a controversy over his action, and just before theAsia Cup the English cricketers had also raised their concern about the bowler. He later claimed that he had a special dispensation from the game's governing body to straighten his arm beyond the allowed 15 degrees. 

Ajmal, during an interview to an English media house, after Pakistan's 3-0 Test win over England in the UAE, had claimed, "ICC has allowed me 23.5 because my arm is not good because of an accident, that is why a problem." 

Sajeed Ajmal



   As long as a bowler chucking to the naked eye. He is a chucker. Don't care  about 15 or30degrees.I have been  closely watching  the game(ONLY AS A CRICKET LOVER) for the last 24 years,In my opinion   Sajeed Ajmal ,Muralitharan  .
(I am also saying that Muraleetharan  is a  spirited, hardworking,gentleman  cricketer with a wrong bowling action  ) Johaan Botha ,Shoaib Malik,Marlon Samuels,  Muhammad Hafeez  ,Malinga ,$Harbhajan Singh  are chuckers .Fidel edward's action is also suspicious. ,Shoaib Akthar(chucks minium two balls in one over),Brett lee ,R.P Singh and Praveenkumar are  also  occasional chuckkers. Watch Sri Lanka's upcoming off spinner  Sachithra Senanayake,who bowled well  against  the brave Bangladesh  today has also a very doutful action BUT None is willing to  correct him.

ntleman  cricketer  Most of the  current off spinners are  chucking to get extra turn  and variations 

    and NONE IS READY TO BELL THE CAT. Third umpire must interfere if a bowler chuckes even only once in a game,.Severe action must be taken against chuckers and occassional chuckers.In my opinion WARNE and KUMBLE are the BEST SPINNERS of NEW ERA .Without the help of  ILLEGAL BENDING OF ARM  Muralitharan CANT ACHIEVE  WHAT HE HAD ACHIEVED   but the fact is that none is ready to say THE KING IS NAKED

Sajeed Ajmal

Muralitharan

        ICC said that unless the Match Referee or the umpires express doubts over AJMAL'S action, nobody has any right to cast aspersions. Doubts over his action were cleared by the ICC in May 2009...“In Ajmal’s case we have tested him, we have monitored him even in live situations, he bowls within the allowed degree of tolerance. So there isn’t any issue with him… You are allowed to bowl with an arm that you don’t straighten in the course of action and he is well within the degrees of tolerance,” an ICC official said.


        NO UMPIRE WILL CALL  BECAUSE THEY ALL KNEW THE  FATE OF THE BOLD DARRELL HAIR, who RIGHTLY no balled  Muttiah Muralitharan seven times in three overs for throwing the ICC later said that umpires had expressed doubts about his legitimacy for more than two years. Biomechanical investigation of Muralitharan's action conducted at the behest of the ICC concluded that a congenital elbow deformity was partly responsible for his unusual action and his arm remained bent throughout delivery of the ball. After further review by an expert panel, the ICC decided to raise the elbow extension limit to 15 degrees for all bowlers. In 1999 Hair was found guilty by the ICC of bringing the game into disrepute after he described Muralitharan action as "diabolical".Hair later received death threats that referenced the throwing incident and as a result the ICC decreed that he would not officiate any of Sri Lankas matches at the 1999 World Cup.^[In 2011, Hair is still saying that Muralitharan's bowling action is suspect.   

Muralitharan

   
 "Muralitharan  has a congenital elbow deformity ,Shoaib  AKTHER' and RP SINGH have  Hyperextension  of arm   AND Sajeed Ajmal had an accident and his hand broken so he can't bowl  as normal...GET LOST....."ICC, PLEASE DONT FOOL US ANYMORE  by these types of RIDICULOUS ASSUMPTIONS.
    NO COMMENTATOR IS BOLD ENOUGH TO CALL THE SPADE A SPADE .RAVI SHASTRI,GAVASKAR,IAN CHAPPEL,RAMEES RAJA,MANJAREKAR,HARSHA BHOGLE,DEAN JOHNS,NASSER HUSSAIN.etc....ALL OF THEM KNEW THE TRUTH ...BUT NONE WILL UTTER A WORD ...BECAUSE THEY LOVE  THEIR JOB.They are also cheating and misleading us..SO THEY CALL MALINGA NOT A CHUCKER BUT A SLINGER.

Harbhajan Singh

Fidel Edwards 

Malinga

Malinga

Fidel Edwards

Brett Lee

Praveen Kumar

                                             

Johaan Botha

                                   

Mohammad Hafeez

                                 

                 
                                                                                  

Marlon Samuels

                                   

Shoaib Malik during  Bio  Mechanics test

1.                   *****   How about testing a bowler during an actual test match. Anyone can alter their action slightly when being put in a clinic and told you are being tested for chucking..*******        

Shoaib Malik

R P Singh

                                     

Shoaib Akthar

                                                 

                               
    PLEASE DONT KILL CRICKET  ...NO ONE CAN BE  CLEARED FOR EVER . THESE TYPE OF BOWLERS DO OFTEN  CHUCK AFTER CLEARANCE.FORGET ABOUT THE MONEY AND MUSCLE POWER OF CRICKET BOARDS.PUT A LASH OF WHIP AGAINST THESE CHUKERS AND WATCH THEM CLOSELY AND BAN THEM IF THEY CONTINUE IT, OTHERWISE YOUNGER GENERATION WILL FOLLOW THESE FELLOWS...THROW AWAY THE ' degrees'  BELIEVE THE NAKED EYE  OR WATCH THE ACTION REPLAYS ,EVEN A BLIND CAN SIMPLY PERCEIVE IT.

 Sachithra Senanayake                            

                                   
                                         
 ICC , please keep your eyes open and come out strongly on those issues and send a clear and loud message to everyone  otherwise what can not be cured must be endured   Nobody in the world can bowl  DOOSRA or THEESARA with legal action.


    PLEASE HAVE A CLOSE LOOK AT  THE ABOVE PHOTOS AND WATCH THE VIDEO FOOTAGE OF THESE BOWLERS AND  JUDGE whether I AM RIGHT OR WRONG
***********************************************************************************************************
THROWING  OR CHUCKING

In the sport of cricket, throwing, commonly referred to as chucking, is an illegal bowling action which occurs when a bowler straightens their arm when delivering the ball. The Laws of Cricket specify that a bowler's arm must be fully extended and rotated about the shoulder to impart velocity to the ball. Throws are not allowed. If the umpire deems that the ball has been thrown, he will call a no ball which means the batsman cannot be given out from that delivery. Current regulations of the International Cricket Council (ICC) set the legal limit of 15 degrees of permissible straightening of the elbow joint for all bowlers in international cricket. This law applies between the point at which the bowling arm passes above shoulder height and the point at which the ball is released.

The charge of 'throwing' against a bowler is one of the most serious and controversial that can be made in cricket, as a bowler with an illegal action cannot dismiss a batsman. This means the player cannot effectively participate in the game, and may not be selected again without significant change to the way they bowl.

Hyperextension

In a recent report by scientists commissioned by the ICC it was shown that Pakistani bowler Shoaib Akhtar and Indian bowler R. P. Singh were seen to extend their elbow joints by a negative angle with respect to the upper arm. This phenomenon, also known as hyperextension, can give the illusion of throwing. However, in the report it was seen that R. P. Singh maintained this negative angle throughout his delivery stride, while Akhtar sometimes bowled a quicker delivery by flexing this hyperextension. These actions are not considered to be chucking as they are due to the unique architecture of their elbows, possibly a congenital condition. Since these cricketers have no control over this hyperextension it is permitted so long as their action is inside the 15 degree elbow extension tolerance threshold.

************************************************************************************************************